Bns Law Guide

A Working Guide to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with effect from 1 July 2024. It governs offences committed on or after that date, while the Indian Penal Code continues to apply to conduct that occurred before it. The BNS is organised into chapters and renumbers the offences that practitioners formerly cited by their IPC numbers.

Companion Statutes

The BNS operates alongside two other enactments that took effect on the same date. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure and governs investigation, arrest, bail and trial procedure. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), replaced the Indian Evidence Act and governs proof, including electronic records.

Mapping of Common Offences

New Elements to Note

The BNS introduces several offences that were not separately codified before, including organised crime, petty organised crime, and acts threatening the sovereignty and integrity of India. It also addresses certain forms of deceit in a sexual relationship and provides heavier punishment in specified categories of death caused by a motor vehicle followed by failure to report. Community service appears among the sentences the courts may impose for certain minor offences. These changes require the complainant or the defence to identify the correct section, since an offence occurring now is charged under the BNS while an old one is charged under the IPC.

What Has Not Changed

Special and local laws continue to operate in their own terms. The dowry prohibition legislation, the narcotics statutes, the offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the protection of women from domestic violence legislation remain as they were. A first information report therefore often combines provisions of the BNS with a special statute.

1. Establish the date of the alleged offence, because that determines whether the IPC or the BNS applies.
2. Identify the corresponding section under the new law if the conduct is recent.
3. Check whether a special statute also applies, and plead it alongside the BNS provision.
4. In procedure, apply the BNSS and, in proof of documents, the BSA.
5. Retain the older citations for offences committed before 1 July 2024, since those cases are tried under the prior law.

For help identifying the correct provision, see our criminal defence services or browse the full range of legal articles.

Choosing the right provision early can shape the whole course of a case. A free first consultation can help you identify the applicable law; call +91-9007000603 to speak with an advocate at the chambers.

BNS 2023 against IPC 1860: the mapping that matters in practice

The Sanhita does not merely renumber the Code. It reorders it, splits some sections, merges others, and changes the punishment in a number of places. A charge sheet, a bail application or a complaint that cites the old section without the new one is not fatal, but it delays the matter while the court and the police reconcile the two. The table below is the mapping that arises most often in the courts at Kolkata.

Offences that did not exist in the Code

Several categories are genuinely new, and they are the ones most likely to appear in a fresh complaint where the old section cannot simply be substituted.

1. Organised crime and petty organised crime, which cover a continuing unlawful activity by a group acting as a syndicate, with the aggravated forms carrying longer terms.
2. Terrorist acts, defined in the Sanhita itself rather than only in the special legislation, with the preparatory and facilitating acts separately punishable.
3. Mob lynching, dealt with as a separate and aggravated form of murder or culpable homicide where a group acts on a protected ground.
4. Sexual intercourse by a person in authority or by deceitful means, which covers a promise of marriage made without the intention of keeping it and analogous situations.
5. Snatching, which was previously prosecuted under the general theft provisions and now has its own section with its own punishment.
6. Community service as a standalone sentence for specified minor offences, including petty theft and defamation, which did not exist as a sentencing option in the Code.

How to use the mapping in a filing

Where an offence was committed before 1 July 2024, the Code applies and the old section is the correct one to cite, because the Sanhita does not operate retrospectively. Where the complaint is filed after that date but the act is earlier, the practice in the courts is to cite the old provision and note the corresponding new one, so that the record is complete whichever construction the court takes. Where the act itself is after 1 July 2024, the Sanhita is the only correct citation, and a complaint that cites only the Code invites an objection on the framing of the charge.

Sections that were left out altogether

Sedition is the most discussed omission: the corresponding provision was not carried forward, and the conduct it covered is now dealt with under the provisions relating to acts threatening the sovereignty and integrity of India. Adultery as a standalone offence was already struck down before the Sanhita was enacted and does not reappear. Attempt to commit suicide was reframed as a provision directing rehabilitation rather than punishment, and the earlier reference to it as an offence is gone. Where an old complaint rests on any of these, the conduct has to be recharacterised under a provision that survives.

Limitation and the new time limits

The Sanhita introduces a general limitation for the first time: a period computed from the date of the offence, longer for offences punishable with more than three years and shorter for the minor ones, with provision for extension where the delay is explained. For a complainant this changes the calculation, because a complaint on a minor offence that lay dormant for a long period can now be refused at the threshold. For a person receiving a notice on an old dispute, the limitation is the first thing to check, because it is a defence that can end the matter before any evidence is led.